Hi,
I have many images that I would like to crop, the cropping will be all the same for all images, 24 pixels will be cropped from the bottom, 131 pixels will be cropped from the top and 19 pixels will be cropped from the left, is it possible to create a marco or maybe that will automatically repeat this process for me, without having to do the cropping for each image which is currently takes time going through the same process.
Thank you
After selecting an area to be cropped and I click on the "Enter" key, the whole pictures is wiped out. If I select the Rectangle tool and pick an area to be cropped and click Image>crop the cropped area is removed and the required picture remains.
Can anyone please tell me how to cure this problem so that the crop tool works properly?
RonB
Hello! Very much so a noob question . ive done my research and im just here for a very definite tutorial . im learning how to resize images from Big to small. Only problem is i cant seem to keep the high quality resolution . Ive included both images .. the "moonshine" collage is what id like to minimize. The "Whiskey" image is able to be downsized with no resolution loss when i downsize why? ID also like to keep them PNG or transparent in the background .
the moonshine collage image is one i made in photoshop cs6.
id like to make them W:280 pixels H:110 pixels/100 pixels
Theres a screen shot of the photo in place . The GREEN image is the image in low resolution , which i cannot figure why . the other RED image is how id like all my images to appear . There both pretty big original images as well ..
Using PS CC. I have set a photo to an image size of 4x6. I am uploading to an online photo printing service to purchase multiple copies of the photo on 4x6 glossy paper. I've tried both Costco Photo and Shutterfly but the cropping that is required cuts into the people shown on the photo. I tried increasing the print size to 5x7 but it cropped even more. If I use my own printer, I can reduce the photo to fit the paper size. This option is not available online. I tried reducing the image size to 5x3, but that doesn't work either. How do I format my photo to eliminate so much cropping with these online services? Thanks for any help you can give me. I've been using Photoshop for several years and have gone to two classes. Unfortunately, I only use it a few times a year so it's almost always like being a newb! Anne
Hi!
I have a dilemma with a high resolution picture that I want to use on a large screen. The problem is the screen has a low resolution which seem to distort the picture sometimes. Also I would like to zoom in the picture.
The monitor is a 47 inch HP LD4720tm sporting a 1,920 by 1,080 resolution. So the resoultion is like an ordinary desktop monitor but the size is more than double that. In other words, the pixel density (ppi) is much smaller.
The picture is of a clock. Size is about 670X670 pixels. I cropped out this clock from a larger 12MP Raw format Nikon picture. The cropped out clock looks something like this (my real image is copyright protected but this is very similar with 700x644px):
(http://www.stanleylondon.com/ClockShipsBellSml1.jpg )
On the screen this picture should take up a fixed size of 170X170 pixels (ie about 10% of the monitor).
The first way I did this was to simply in Photoshop Elements save the 670X670 picture as a png and with dimensions 170X170 pixels. ("Save for web" to get it as small in size as possible and chose png and 170X170). Then I put the 170X170 pic on the background canvas. It looks very nice. However, when I zoomed in the numbers and other details look very jagged or blurry.
So now I tried with the larger resolution 670X670px. I put this on the background too, and as it should only take up 170X170px, I clicked it and dragged to resize it. But this picture looks much worse than the 170X170 pic. I suppose the 170X170 pic perfectly fits the 170X170 space while the 670X670px is distorted. I mean, for the 170X170 pic there will be one pixel for each monitor point. When I do the exact same comparison on a 21 inch 1920X1080 monitor they look equally good, so it must be due to the low pixel density of the 48 inch monitor where the human eye can see each pixel.
However, now when I zoom in the details for the 670X670px were clearly visible.
I tried a few other resoultions like 360X360 and 270X270 (I resized the 670X670 pic to these sizes) and both png and jpeg. They also looked worse in normal view but of course in zoomed view they displayed more details than the 170X170 pic.
My dilemma now is how to get an image that will look good both when zoomed in and when in 100% zoom (normal view) on this large screen. Is there a way to do this. Eg like resizing to a resolution larger than 170X170 that will also look good in normal view.
Thanks.
Hi, just joined up as I'm stumped on how to get the most out of a picture I'm editing.
The photo is of my boy and a design company used this on my website but I now want to use the same image on a leaflet so need it at the original high res and with the top of his head (it was cropped off in the site)
I've done the cut out and some touching up but don't know how to get the brightness the same, particularly his bright blue eyes.
Would be really grateful if someone could give me some tips on how to do this please. I use CS6 if that makes any difference.
My image:
And I'd like to get it looking like this:
Many thanks
Dan
I have a background image that is 5" x 7". When I crop in half it becomes 1.5" x 2"? I can't figure out what I am doing wrong.
Thanks!
Mary
I would very much appreciate it if me and the red headed girl could be cropped from the photo (I'm wearing a suit and holding a champagne glass and she's next to me haha) and be photoshopped into the 'party' image in a really cool way :P it's just for something silly haha. I reckon it would work best if it's inserted onto the side and she is on the corner anyway. If that doesn't work, maybe just crop me and put me into the photo thanks! Love you guys!
Hi,
I am learning Photoshop in the hope of printing posters. I have questions regarding printing. Originally, when you create an image the resolution is set to 72 pixels/inch. I have learned I need to switch that to 300 pixel/inch.
1)Will I have to recreate all my images from scratch in 300 resolution?
2)Do I lose a lot of quality on the final product if i convert 72 -> 300.
3)My images are 11x17, when i hit 100% and view rulers, it shows my image at roughly a 3:1 ratio, why does it do this?
4)Can I view what a final printed image will look like with in Photoshop?
5)How do I preserve quality when switching to 300 resolution?
6)Say I use an image that is originally 600x600, will switching to 300 resolution make the new image horrible?
I may have more questions with as these get answered,
Thank you,
Geokatz
I have several images in different layer in PS3 ( macro images with different points of focus).
I have aligned all layers ok, but when trying to blend the layer (all layers selected) using the auto blend layers tools, the tool does not give me the stacked images button.
Instead it launches straight into the process.
The results are not what I am expecting, each layer bar one has a totally black mask, and the image is not a blend of all the images.
All tutorials for the process using CS3 show a button for selecting "stack images" mine doesn't.
Am I doing something wrong?
Please help as I am going mad with it
Long story short...I need a way to quickly drag multiple images to my canvas and put them in certain places without any of them overlapping each other. At the moment, when I select multiple images and drag them onto the canvas, they all sit on top of each other right in the middle until I go to each layer and move to their own space.
Is there a way I can automate the images to go to the correct position? Having to go layer by layer doing that manually takes a lot of time when I have 20+ images per sheet so I'm hoping there is a quicker way. I'm well aware of actions but not sure how I can use that to place images to different parts of the canvas. As far as I know, creating an action will put each image on the same spot of the canvas but hopefully I'm wrong about that and someone can show me the correct way of setting it up.